BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mary Delaney Krugman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS The historic preservation free range.
Date:
Sat, 7 Feb 1998 15:20:10 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
In a message dated 2/7/98 1:20:48 PM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:

> The four catagories as outlined, Preservation
>  (protection and stabilization), Rehabilitation, Restoration and
>  Reconstruction should serve as the broader context for our debates.
>

A great idea.  Although the Sec of Int Standards and Guidelines are not
perfect, they are the measure by which all project are judged in the
profession.  Because they are so broad and open to interpretation, applying
them to actual projects results in a wide range of solutions -- some of which
may be thought inappropriate by another's interpretation.  At least we should
use the same language, even if we arrive at different conclusions in a given
project.

Mary Krugman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2