BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
BP - Telepathic chickens leave no traces.
Date:
Tue, 28 Apr 1998 11:39:05 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
Here's a forwarded posting from the land use bar that might be of interest.
__________________________________________
Subj:	 Tax Note:  When is a building "lost?"
Date:	4/28/98 9:38:29 AM EST
From:	[log in to unmask] (Patrick A. Randolph, Jr.)
Reply-to:	[log in to unmask]


The following posting is taken from the "Real Estate Tax Soup"  List, a list
maintained by the Tax Analysts service.  More information about Tax Analysts
appears at the end of this posting.  You can find the TNT cites in the LEXIS
tax database.   For more information about this service, contact
[log in to unmask]

Couple's Loss Occurred Before They Destroyed Building; Deduction Denied

     A U.S. district court has held that a couple is not entitled to a
deduction for the loss of a building they demolished, finding that the loss
occurred before the building was destroyed when the couple discovered
asbestos and the building was vandalized.

     Linden and Lois Gates purchased an old school building in 1984,
intending to renovate and lease the building. In 1988, the building was
damaged by vandals and the Gateses discovered asbestos in the floor tiles
and heating system. In 1991, the Gateses demolished the building and
subdivided the underlying land into residential lots.

     In 1995, the couple filed an amended tax return for 1991, claiming a
deduction for the loss of the building. The IRS disallowed the deduction,
and the Gateses filed this refund suit. The taxpayers relied on De Cou v.
Commissioner, 103 T.C. 80 (1994) (94 TNT 164-14), in which the Tax Court
ruled that the limitations on deductions imposed by section 280B doesn't
apply to losses occurring before a structure is demolished.

     Chief District Judge Sylvia H. Rambo noted that the taxpayers in De
Cou were allowed the loss deduction because they took affirmative steps to
withdraw their building from use in the year they claimed the deduction,
and because they claimed a deduction in the same year that they discovered
the defects in the building. Here, Judge Rambo said, the Gateses took no
affirmative steps to withdraw the school building from use in 1991, and the
events that caused the school to lose its value (the asbestos and
vandalism) occurred before 1991. Thus, Judge Rambo found De Cou
distinguishable.

     The Gateses alternatively contended that a tax-significant event
occurred when a potential buyer of the building withdrew interest, but the
court pointed out that the sale negotiations broke down before 1991.
Moreover, the "breakdown of sales negotiations is not a closed or completed
transaction giving rise [to] a deductible loss."

     Judge Rambo noted that section 280B would be rendered meaningless if
the court adopted the Gateses' contention that their unilateral decision to
withdraw an asset from service entitles them to a deduction in that year.
If a taxpayer's decision was itself sufficient, Judge Rambo reasoned,
"section 280B would never apply because every structure would be withdrawn
from use before its demolition." (For the full text of this decision,
Linden Gates, et ux. v. United States,81 AFTR2d Par. 98-629, No.
1:CV-97-0676, see Doc 98-13202 (9 pages) or  98 TNT 79-13.)

As a full text document service, Tax Analysts is dedicated to providing
comprehensive service to subscribers and others who use our products. Toobtain
a print copy of  a document, call our Access Service at 1 (800) 9552444.
Documents are also available electronically from Lexis and Dialog in the TNT
(Tax Notes Today) database. For assistance in obtaining a document online,
call
1 (800) 6342430.

News Wire, Discussion Group Archives Available in Web Site Have you visited
our
Web site (<http://www.tax.org/>www.tax.org) recently? We've made a few
improvements we think are worth noting. For one, back editions of Real Estate
Internet Talk Soup, the Real Estate Discussion Group,and our 21 other
discussion group bulletins are available in an archive. To view back copies of
these bulletins, simply "http" to our home page, click on the discussion group
icon, and then scroll down to the archive directory. From there, you can view
the archives of any group you wish.

Along with these discussion group archives are several other Web features that
may interest you. From our home page, you may access the Tax Notes NewsWire,
which is updated three times a day with the latest news out of the IRS, the
Courts, and Congress. In addition, the Calendar page will keep you up to date
on government and nongovernment events held around the country.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2