BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Mortar
From:
John Walsh <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
The listserv where the buildings do the talking <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:44:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines) 
Leland,
I would not use that number with any confidence.  The standard is not
written for mortar and the reported precision and bias may not apply.  To my
knowledge, there has been no interlaboratory testing using E 96 for mortar
or brick.
John

-----Original Message-----
From: The listserv where the buildings do the talking
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Leland Torrence
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 8:03 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [BP] Mortar

Mike,
Is it true that ASTM E-96 allows for a 76% acceptable variance for testing
moisture vapor transmission?
Best,
Leland

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2