BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Change in NYC facade cleaning regulations...
From:
Met History <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Preservationists shouldn't be neat freaks." -- Mary D
Date:
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 14:11:39 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
In a message dated 07/26/2000 11:54:38 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< DEP being more stringent in the issuance of violations, but there also
has to be factored in >>

OK, Ken (or other Pinheadf) just how much more stringent is DEP these days.
If you clean ten buildings with detergent for the brick and water for the
limestone - but no collection troughs or other protection - how many
summonses will you get?  1 out of 10?  8 out of 10?

Christopher

ATOM RSS1 RSS2