BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Pamela S. Follett" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Pre-patinated plastic gumby block w/ coin slot <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 08:56:26 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Listening to the uber-Ralph would be appropriate because he won't shut up
and Stoney can't hear what he has to say about his being a messenger from
God and he's here to spread his money around to make little kids happy, oh
and nuke Iraq or send in 1M troops, or outlaw same-sex marriage, and what do
I think about that to which my answer is I prefer not to share that
information.

I finally had it with him yesterday morning and threw him out.  He proved
himself to be a sexist prigg (something I suspected all along), and couldn't
understand what would piss me off so much by saying there are just certain
things a woman shouldn't do.  I was carrying the sandwich board out to the
street - a daily event, and apparently one I'm supposed to hire someone else
to do for me.  I told him not to ever tell me there were things I couldn't
do.  Even when he came back later and tried to explain that he didn't say
there were things a woman couldn't do, but rather things they shouldn't do,
I refused his apology.  He just wasn't getting that telling a woman she
shouldn't do something is ultimately the same as telling her she can't.

So, you're welcome to add that to Stoney's story, since I'd have to gather
he doesn't have thoughts one way or the other about what other people
should(n't) do in the world.

- Pam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gabriel Orgrease" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 08:06
Subject: Re: [BP] Not Quite There


> Pamela S. Follett wrote:
>
> >Definitely continue it, but I'm not sure about ending it yet!
> >
> >
> It is a fairly deliberate take-off on Being There by Jerzy Kosinski, and
> as you may remember Peter Sellers in the movie w/ Shirley McLaine.
> Where Not Quite There goes to, though, is soon to be elsewhere than w/
> the Kosinski novel & Chauncey the Gardiner.
> Stoney will not get to meet the president... it would be too momentous
> of an occurence.
> I think I'll send him to a coffee shop near you where he can listen to
> the uber-Ralph.
> I'm not sure if the ending for Stoney should be vaporization, falling
> asleep under a pear tree or getting hit by a truck.
>
> ][<
>
> --
> To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
> uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
> <http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
>

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2