BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Michael P. Edison" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Preservationists shouldn't be neat freaks." -- Mary D
Date:
Wed, 19 Jul 2000 18:10:52 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Message text written by "BP - \"Preservationists shouldn't be neat
freaks.\"  -- Mary D"
>None of that newfangled bubblicious epoxy-based
stuff.  We want old-growth bazooka.
<

I went to my resident teenager for an expert opinion on this critical
materials science issue, and he stated (though not in these terms) that
Bubblicious is generally preferred for its lower modulus, although stale
Bazooka has a funky appeal that is hard to justify scientifically but is
curiously satisfying at times.

Mike E.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2