BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Met History <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "Infarct a Laptop Daily"
Date:
Thu, 23 Mar 2000 18:17:36 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
[log in to unmask] writes:

<<  At Dell Corporation, we find that mortar analyses reports for mortars
that are 50 to 60 years old or less can be useful to the guy in the field. >>

Bryan, what are they useful for?  Solely for matching the existing mortar?
Or is there some larger diagnostic function?  And does your post indicate
that analysis of mortars older than half a century is not useful?

Christopher Gray (formerly known as Struck Joint)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2