BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Callan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"Let us not speak foul in folly!" - ][<en Phollit
Date:
Thu, 8 May 2003 08:10:19 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (529 bytes) , text/enriched (703 bytes)
Do you really want to blame the victim?

Would it have been okay if everyone had survived?

-jc

On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 07:57  AM, Met History wrote:

> In a message dated 5/8/03 8:53:09 AM, [log in to unmask] 
> writes:
>
> can't find the weapons of mass destruction
>
>
>
> How about inadequate fireproofing of WTC?  That was pretty mass.
>
> Sign me,  Still Think The "Presumptious" Question Of What Would Have 
> Happened to the Empire State Building Is Relevant, and That The 
> Defense That The WTC "Performed Remarkably Well" Is Spurious

ATOM RSS1 RSS2