On 12/4/2010 5:38 AM, Leland Torrence wrote:
> and we were told it was considered a sustainable source.
>    
Leland,

"... we were told..." When I looked into ipe a few years ago, and you 
may be able to find some of that inquiry in the BP archives, one 
predominant unresolved question was that though it is purported to be 
from a 'sustainable source' that despite any paperwork indicating same 
that it could very likely not be, and more probably is not, from a 
sustainable source. In the case of being told a source is sustainable if 
the speaker means in fact that they can sustain supplying it to you as 
long as you pay for it then I presume then yes that it is sustainable.

][<

--
**Please remember to trim posts, as requested in the Terms of Service**

To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>