[log in to unmask] wrote:
>
>     In comparison we have the same problems today; a hurricane takes
>     out a dryvit mall and the people bemoan that  millions are lost
>     . Yet they will replace it with another dryvit mall whose life may
>     only be 15 years anyway
>
> I am still not convinced that quick-obsolete buildings are not 
> economically more sound than building for permanence, and then having 
> to toss the whole thing out.  But then Sempronius was a friend of mine.
c,

It depends on to what degree the environment is considered in the 
economic equation. Then again, Sempronius is know to spend a lot of time 
at Summerhill soaking up the rays. Last anyone should desire is for him 
to hang out at a coffee house on DFI where I assume that you made his 
acquaintance last.

][<

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://listserv.icors.org/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>