BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David west <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
BP - "the place where the heavy conservationists hang out"
Date:
Fri, 30 Jul 1999 05:02:32 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>>> JRhodes <[log in to unmask]> 30/07/99 5:35:35 >>>
wrote:
"Could the shading effect actually be beneficial in moderating the
temperature swings?"

I worry about the whole biodeterioration argument.
Vines do macro-damage - opening the joints.
The sucker pads do micro-damage - attaching to the surface and plucking it when removed.
Lichen does micro-damage - plucking the surface of stones when removed.
Lichen can also do more substantial damage via the effect of the organic acids gradually dissolving the stone below.

However, the effect of vines in providing insulation to the surface could be enormously beneficial, particularly for materials which suffer from moisture and thermal expansion problems such as clay-rich sandstone.  An evergreen vine like ivy will provide sufficient surface cover to reduce surface temperature variation (particularly in summer) and to reduce significantly the amount of surface wetting to the masonry.

On this basis, there is the distinct possibility that the ivy might prolong the life of susceptible masonry materials, whilst actually forcing the wall apart due to growth through joints.

What to do?  Trellis screens with a gap for regular maintenance sounds pretty slick to me!

Shall we start the "ivy saves buildings" push?

Cheers

david

ATOM RSS1 RSS2