BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 2nd tower question
From:
David W Wood <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 6 Aug 2007 21:24:50 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines) 
Hi:
45 degrees is the optimum angle of course.  If you reduce the angle the
tensile strength of the guys can be reduced.

David


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Brett Winches
Sent: 06 August 2007 21:18
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: 2nd tower question

For same 50 foot crank up tower, what minimum guy angle between 45 and x
would be best.  I think I would prefer 45 but am curious as to what
lower angles might also meet safety needs.  I expect not to go below 30
and more likely 35 degrees. =20

The system will be a set of 3 guy points. =20

###Thank you!
Brett Winchester=20
[log in to unmask]
ICBVI -- Reading Services
P O BOX 83720
BOISE IDAHO  83720-0012=20
208-334-3220-104
208-639-8386 DID
208-334-2963 fax
###

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
16:53
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.8/940 - Release Date: 06/08/2007
16:53
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2