The military has never had the blank check that it enjoys now.
--Lou K2LKK
At 07:53 PM 1/1/2008 -0700, you wrote:
>and oddly enough, even though 440 repeaters were active throughout the
>coldwar erra, they were never a problem until now...how odd.
>73
>Colin, V A6BKX
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:46 PM
>Subject: Re: 440
>
>
> > My understanding is that its got something to do with potential problems
>with
> > rader. I'm only about 40 miles from the Crawford ranch (if that far) and
>some
> > systems in this area have been shut down. Of course, there is Brooks etc.
>in
> > San Antonio not too far from us as well as Austin which is about 80 miles
>from
> > us and Fort Hood which is about 10 miles from us. I suspect we may see
>some
> > undesierable stuff from all this before its all over with.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > Tom Brennan KD5VIJ, CCC-A/SLP
> > web page http://titan.sfasu.edu/~g_brennantg/sonicpage.html
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, Jed Barton wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:29:42 -0500
> > > From: Jed Barton <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: 440
> > >
> > > Hey guys, just to set the record straight, it has affected RI.
> > > One of my repeaters had to go off the air. In regards to machines with
> > > coverage, that had nothing to do with it. There is a lot more than
>people
> > > know about. Here's the basics of it though.
> > > I'm a member of the newengland spectrum management council, and we had
>to
> > > deal with this stuff. Although the military won't tell us much, we've
>made
> > > a determination that it is frequency specific. Although we can't 100
> > > percent prove it, it has nothing to do with coverage. Some prime
>coverage
> > > machines idn't have to go off the air.
> > > In the case of my repeaters, it's not the end of the world, cause I can
> > > re-deploy the hardware at another sight.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: For blind ham radio operators
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > > On Behalf Of John Miller
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:12 PM
> > > To: [log in to unmask]
> > > Subject: Re: 440
> > >
> > > RI as well has been affected and rumor is they're looking at 1 or 2
>machines
> > > in CT but I have nothing official on that. I'm still surprised the 440
> > > machine with the best coverage in MA hasn't been touched yet when the
> > > numbers indicate it should be, I"m wondering if they're just going after
> > > everyone based on an older list at first and this one has only been up
>for
> > > maybe a year now.
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 12:01 PM
> > > Subject: Re: 440
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > I think this is just a regional issue in California and Massachusetts.
> > > > I haven't heard anything about closing down the band elsewhere.
> > > >
> > > > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 11:13 AM 12/30/2007 -0500, you wrote:
> > > >>I hope not.
> > > >>
> > > >>I really enjoy 440 especially with an ht.
> > > >>
> > > >>73 De Anthony W2AJV
> > > >>[log in to unmask]
> > > >>ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
> > > >>
> > > >>----- Original Message -----
> > > >>From: "Walter Hampton" <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > > >>Sent: Friday, December 28, 2007 10:27 PM
> > > >>Subject: 440
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > Are we going to lose the 440 cm band? i paid a lot of money for my
> > > >> > = radio. k7ij Bruce had to shut off his repeater. what a waste. it
> > > >> > sure = makes me mad. all that money. and all the repeaters have to
> > > >> > be shut = down. what is next? 2 meters? Whatv is going to happen
> > > >> > next to 440?=20
> > > >> >
> > > >> > from walter wb6jtj Walter p.s. 440 was, or is a good band.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>--
> > > >>No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > >>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > >>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date:
> > > >>1/1/2008
> > > >>12:09 PM
> > > >
> > > > Louis Kim Kline
> > > > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > > > Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> > > > Work e-mail: [log in to unmask] Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1206 - Release Date: 1/1/2008
>12:09 PM
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.17.13/1207 - Release Date: 1/2/2008
>11:29 AM
Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone: (585) 697-5740
|
