BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:15:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
As long as people are willing to buy the radios that are out there I don't believe you'll see too many changes.
When i'n ready I'm going after a K3.



Sent from Anthony Vece's Verizon iPhone

On Mar 17, 2011, at 4:58 PM, colin McDonald <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> the DSP technology in the ts570 is way way more than 10 years old.
> The DSP technology in the ts2000 is more than 11 years old at this point 
> since I think they proto typed the ts2K in the late '90's, probably 98/99 
> before they released it in 2000.
> the ts570 has been around allot longer than the ts2000...not sure exactly 
> when the 570 was released, but it was at least 15 years ago, likely longer 
> than that.
> I was having a conversation with a few local hams about this exact 
> thing...how technology in the ham radio industry hasn't changed a whole lot 
> in about 10 to 15 years.
> And, the big 3 are still charging huge amounts of money for new radios that 
> use the same older technology in them such as DSP circuits and general 
> functions and features.
> This is why I am really looking forward to the products designed by 
> companies like Wouxun and others...they will have the tradditional 
> technology, but will also be far more willing to implement brand new stuff 
> into their radios and products without charging twice as much for the new 
> features like the big 3 like to do.
> It would be like apple releasing an old '90's style flip phone, with blue 
> tooth,  and charging double for it because it's an apple product and has 
> some newer technology in it...that is what is happening in the ham radio 
> industry...we are still getting radios that have the same features, and 
> functions, and similar design and circuitry as what was availible 15 years 
> ago.
> And anything that does have newer or improved design features is hugely 
> expensive...see the IC7800 and radios in it's class.
> They add some more functions via the micro processer, throw a few more knobs 
> and buttons and connecters into the thing and charge 11 grand for it.
> the radio probably costs 200 bucks to build.
> So, companies like wouxun, will take all the best features, and combine them 
> into a classy looking, desirable rig and charge 500 for it and still make a 
> big proffit.
> 
> There are rumblings about wouxun coming out with an HF rig in the not too 
> distant future...I can't wait to see that.
> Give the big 3 a real run for their money hi.
> Something that is say similar to the IC7000 or FT857 for half or a third of 
> the price.
> 
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michael Ryan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:05 PM
> Subject: Yaesu Mic on a Kenwood
> 
> 
>> Hi all:=20
>> 
>> Ordered my new antenna today and I've been thinking about a backup plan, =
>> should my FT-450 don't tune my G5RV and the TS-570 does.=20
>> Would it be safe to use my MD-100A8X desk mic on the 570? =20
>> I've been also thinking that I'd have to unload the FT-450 as it =
>> wouldn't be suitable for an HF remote.=20
>> I wouldn't install it as a mobile because that would require some more =
>> expense, plus it would have to be professionally installed, under the =
>> terms of our agreement with our car's company,=20
>> plus there isn't much room for the 450 in the car. =20
>> I hope it doesn't come to that because I love the 450 and having tested =
>> it for almost a year now, I think for the price, its one of the best =
>> performing rigs in its class.=20
>> It out performs the 570 as well. Course, the 570's DSP system is 10 year =
>> old technology, which is why the 590 was released last year.=20
>> It probably performs better than the FT-450 but its also twice as 
>> much.=20=
>> 
>> =20
>> 
>> 73:=20
>> 
>> Michael De VO1RYN=20 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2