BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: 6v vertical antenna
From:
"David R. Basden" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:47:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
I'm afraid the dipole is a better receiving antenna.  The vertical 
polarization picks up more noise.  It's a better DX antenna though.

73 de W7OQ, Dave


At 12:39 PM 8/23/2007, you wrote:
>I'll be putting the vertical butternut 6v up tomorrow.  I ordered the =
>coax today so it will be here tomorrow.  I am curious to see if the =
>reception is better with the vertical than it is with the dipole.  =
>Anyway, I'll have both of them to switch back and forth from.
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.2/967 - Release Date: 
>8/22/2007 6:51 PM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2