BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 16:33:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (120 lines)
Walt,

I think that call may have been reissued.  The Dog I heard was named 
Mike, and I think he lived somewhere in Virginia.  Of course, he 
could have moved, but I'd be surprised if he changed his name.  I 
thought he was an Extra, but I don't really know that.

Steve

On Thursday 3/30/06 12:42 Walt Smith wrote:
>Callsign: WA4DOG
>Class: General
>Codes: HAI   USA
>Name: JAMES E CAMERON, SR
>Addr1: 649 RIDGEWAY DR
>Addr2: ALEXANDER CITY, AL 35010
>Country: USA
>Effective: 27 May 1997   Expires: 27 May 2007
>
>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>   From: Bob Moore - KA5ETA=20
>   To: [log in to unmask]
>   Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 12:38 PM
>   Subject: Re: k1man
>
>
>   Steve I got the call sign wrong to begin with but you are right it was =
>"wa 4=20
>   dog"  I was never sure about the guy either.  There is one thing about =
>him=20
>   he could and did get people excited.
>
>   ----- Original Message -----=20
>   From: "Steve Dresser" <[log in to unmask]>
>   To: <[log in to unmask]>
>   Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 11:01 AM
>   Subject: Re: k1man
>
>
>   > Bob,
>   >
>   > I could never figure out whether the Dog was serious, or whether he
>   > just said things to stir people up.  And you're right, he was some
>   > sort of TV technician.  More than that, he was a minority of one.
>   >
>   > Steve
>   >
>   > On Thursday 3/30/06 10:55 Bob Martin wrote:
>   >>You folks will appreciate this... And it's accurate...
>   >>
>   >>I once had a dog fight with The Dog.  WI4B and I were talking on 40 =
>meters
>   >>about ways we were using the Apple IIe with our students.  Dog said =
>there
>   >>are some people whom he disliked and who shouldn't be on HAM radio.
>   >>Included in his list were several minority groups and "blind =
>people."  I
>   >>think he is or was a television technician and held or holds an =
>Extra=20
>   >>Class
>   >>License.
>   >>
>   >>Bob Martin
>   >>
>   >>
>   >>Please visit http://www.wan-leatonks.net.
>   >>----- Original Message -----
>   >>From: "Bob Moore - KA5ETA" <[log in to unmask]>
>   >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>   >>Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 10:27 AM
>   >>Subject: Re: k1man
>   >>
>   >>
>   >> > Talking about people that the rules do not apply to what happened =
>to=20
>   >> > the
>   >> > DOG?  I don't remember for sure but was the call n5dog?
>   >> > ----- Original Message -----
>   >> > From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
>   >> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>   >> > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 7:35 AM
>   >> > Subject: Re: k1man
>   >> >
>   >> >
>   >> >> His problem has never, imo, been with his operating skills, per =
>se,=20
>   >> >> but =3D
>   >> >> with his arrogant attitude that the rules about "broadcasting" =
>and =3D
>   >> >> commercial use of the bands don't apply to him.
>   >> >>
>   >> >>  ----- Original Message -----=3D20
>   >> >>  From: Kevin Kwan=3D20
>   >> >>  To: [log in to unmask]
>   >> >>  Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:59 AM
>   >> >>  Subject: k1man
>   >> >>
>   >> >>
>   >> >>  regarding Glen Bastard, apparently he's behaving himself on the =
>yl =3D
>   >> >> system on
>   >> >>  14.332. He helps out with net control activities and relays =
>pertinent
>   >> >>  information. I was surprised when I heard his call sign thrown =
>around=20
>   >> >> =3D
>   >> >> during
>   >> >>  the summer when I first became active on that frequency. It's =
>neat to=20
>   >> >> =3D
>   >> >> hear
>   >> >>  such a character exhibited good operator skills, since he's =
>proven in=20
>   >> >> =3D
>   >> >> the
>   >> >>  past to have none.
>   >> >>
>   >> >
>   >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2