Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Oct 2008 20:58:35 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have done it but can't remember how right now since I haven't played with
it in a while.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: PA QSO Party logging - JFW scripts
> John:
>
> Can you answer our question about the easiest way to edit contacts?
>
> 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: PA QSO Party logging - JFW scripts
>
>
>>I use N3FJP for everything I need contesting software for and am trying to
>> get my club to do the same for field day. I love it and even bought the
>> whole package of their programs.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve Forst" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 3:05 PM
>> Subject: Re: PA QSO Party logging - JFW scripts
>>
>>
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> I think Tom KB8TYJ uses the N3FJP software in the PAQSO. I think he is
>>> out
>>> of town for a few days, but when you see him back on the list later
>>> this
>>> week, ask him. The other one you mentioned is very popular, but I've
>>> never
>>> tried it and don't know if it is accessible. BTW, I use Writelog for
>>> PAQSO
>>> and all other contests.
>>>
>>> 73 Steve KW3A
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Senk, Mark J. (CDC/NIOSH/NPPTL)" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:59 AM
>>> Subject: PA QSO Party logging - JFW scripts
>>>
>>>
>>>>A friend wants to use N3FJP for the PA QSO Party and wonders if there
>>>> are scripts.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is there an easy way to get the next contact number? How do you make
>>>> corrections once a contact is logged?
>>>>
>>>> I also see WB3W is suggested. What do you think of that program?
>>>>
>>>> I have been off the list so forgive me if this has been discussed.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>
|
|
|