BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:05:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
With the MC-50, all those older radios sounded great. 520, 120, 130, I think 
140 was 4 pin, 530, 820, 830,  and any I missed with the 4 pin connector. 
The hand mics don't impress me, the the MC-50 does and the commercial mic I 
have I got with my TS-520 isn't too bad either, or the other similar mics.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: TS-120


> hahahaha. the radios I blew the bum outa were on air at the time. I was
> making some adjustments and I needed an ear a fair way away to inform me
> of any changes in the audio and well you get the idea.
> oh well, while I'm on it, what do people think about the tx audio of the
> old 120s, from what I remember of the things, they had some grunt even
> without any kind of compression or processing. even the 120v had some 
> balls.
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2