the only problem with apartment antennas is that they are usually pretty
inefficient because they have to be loaded substantially or trapped excetra.
This means conditions have to be really good before those stations start to
work...especially if the antenna is inside.
With the unstable conditions, having consistent success would be difficult
and probably pretty disheartening for most who try it.
That said, they do work and there are lots of success stories online with
window antennas, balcony antennas and so on.
73
Colin, V A6BKX
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:35 AM
Subject: Re: BAND conditions
> Well, I guess there are advantages and disadvantages to everything. I
> know of some people in apartments and thigns like that who have managed to
> put together antennas, but you have to be creative about it.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, 30 May 2006, Anthony Vece wrote:
>
> > Hi Jeff & List;
> >
> > I don't know about BPL but, antenna issues are another story.
> >
> > Susan and I at some point want to move into a 55 and up community.
> >
> > The up side basically is that their is no maintenance but, I can't put
up
> > antennas.
> >
> > Echolink is fine but, it just doesn't cut it.
> >
> > Echolink is good if your antenna comes down and you know it will go back
up
> > soon other than that, I don't think it has any real value.
> >
> > I would get board with it in very little time.
> >
> > 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> > [log in to unmask]
> > ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 10:01 AM
> > Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] BAND conditions
> >
> >
> > > Hi there, I think that BPL will be the biggest threat, and the
antenna
> > > issue. I know that in Virginia the BPL I think is in use, but I don't
> > > know if it has started up for sure or not. Does anyone know where
this is
> > > going to expand to next with regard to BPL?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 30 May 2006, Colin McDonald wrote:
> > >
> > >> personally i don't think it has much to do with echolink or
IRLP...since
> > >> there aren't a whole lot of HF privvallaged folks on there anyway.
> > >> Its probably got more to do with the fact that most people in our day
and
> > >> age don't have as much time for persuing their radio hobby as they
once
> > >> did.
> > >> Also, with the american operators becoming more and more restricted
as to
> > >> antennas in housing developments, with hams who previously operated
HF,
> > >> now
> > >> having to stick to 2M and 70CM because they can only use a mobile set
up.
> > >> I think echolink and IRLP are pretty much the least of the issues out
> > >> there
> > >> that are causing us to hear less and less folks on the HF bands.
> > >> Lets not forget that many many hams simply aren't bothering to get on
the
> > >> air because they do not like to deal with unstable conditions and are
> > >> waiting for conditions to get more stable, if not necesarily better.
> > >> the threat of BPL has also thrown a shadow over many, and their plans
for
> > >> antennas and so on have been put on hold until plans are finalized
one
> > >> way
> > >> or the other for BPL projects...no point in putting in an expensive
> > >> antenna
> > >> system when it will prove useless when BPL goes through in your area
> > >> right?
> > >> I think another big problem, especially right now, is that there are
less
> > >> and less US hams that are getting HF privallages because the
regulations
> > >> are
> > >> still quite stringent. You will hear many many more hams from Canada
and
> > >> other countries who have relaxed the code requirements on the HF
bands
> > >> now
> > >> compared with a year ago.
> > >> These are surprisingly very good operators and I personally have seen
> > >> nothing but good come out of relaxing the code requirement here.
> > >> 73
> > >> Colin, V A6BKX
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.4/351 - Release Date:
5/29/2006
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
|
