BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barbara Lombardi <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:20:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
At&t used to offer that service for a fee of course if you were a subscriber
to worldnet.att.net.  I tried it some years ago and it worked quite well but
gave it up.  


 
-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Frederick
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 8:27 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: e-mail by phone

Hi Howard,
     I did a Google search and found the following link. I have no personal
experience with this company but it looked like it would do what you are
looking for.

https://www.j2.com/jconnect/twa/page/emailByPhone?gclid=CL2LlMjqn44CFSMWhwod
CHKRQQ&VID=33675&OFFERCODE=J2_PREMIER_NOACT_30DAY&CMP=KNC-33675Email&rqcp=1

God bless,
Mark
God loves you!
My ham radio lists.
http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
My personal website
http://funhamradio.bloki.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 4:55 AM
Subject: e-mail by phone


>I am trying to help a lady who wants access to sending and receiving e-mail
> by voice.  I just thought about why not a e-mmail by phone system rather
> than a computer based system?  Does anybody know of anybody using one of
> those services?  Can I get in contact with them to figure out if this a 
> good
> recommendation?  The Lady is around 80, and has family in South America. 
> I
> was using system access and it's voice mail which seemed a lot simpler 
> than
> typing in Spanish.  This might be better yet.
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2