BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 May 2010 09:17:36 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Let's not get caught up with accessibility.
Let's use the radio and see if it meets our specifications and worry  
about the small stuff later.


Sent from my iPhone

On May 31, 2010, at 8:41 AM, John Miller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Personally I think the TS-2000 talks too much with the speech board  
> in it,
> if the 480 does more than that it would go out the window if I had  
> one.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christian" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2010 8:01 AM
> Subject: Kenwood TS-480 more accessible than TS-2000?
>
>
>> Hi,
>> I am still thinking about the TS-2000 since I also want to have 2m  
>> and
>> 70cm=
>> and the TS-480 only features shortwave and 50 MHz.
>> But someone told me that it was more accessible, is this really true?
>> Many thanks,
>> Christian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2