BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Kline <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:49:52 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
I think you're right.
--Lou, K2LKK



At 04:46 PM 2/2/2008 -0600, you wrote:
>Lou,
>
>I just don't think they care.
>
>Fred Olver  N9BSO
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 1:59 PM
>Subject: TS2000S -- Why the Critique
>
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > The main reason why I lamb-basted Kenwood concerning the TS2000S is the
> > receiver noise floor issue.  I didn't realize how bad it is until I
> > started
> > doing some rig to rig comparisons during the VHF contest, and discovered
> > that the Kenwood TS690 stomps the snot out of the TS2000S on 6 meters, and
> > the TS790A stomps the snot out of it on 2 meters and 70 cm.  I already
> > knew
> > the TS690 is quieter on HF, but the receiver sensitivity isn't as critical
> > as it is on VHF/UHF.
> >
> > My take on it is this.  In any rig that I buy, it is receiver performance
> > that I hold out for primarily.  Anybody can build a transmitter section
> > that will do the job reasonably well--that isn't rocket science.  But it
> > is
> > generally the receiver section that makes a rig exceptional or very bad,
> > because let's face it folks--you can't work 'em if you can't hear 'em.
> >
> > My point is that for the cost of the rqadio, I think Kenwood could have
> > paid a little more attention to receiver noise, and for the length of time
> > that radio has been on the market, they could have come out with a revised
> > version, if they cared at all.  Or even if they had a more expensive
> > version that provided a first class receiver, I'm the kind of operator
> > that
> > would spend the extra bucks to get something really good if it were in my
> > means to do so.  My take on the TS2000S is that it is a good radio for
> > folks that do casual operation on a lot of different bands, but for
> > someone
> > who is looking for very good performance, it comes up short.
> >
> > That is my two cents worth.
> >
> > 73, de Lou K2LKK
> >
> >
> >
> > Louis Kim Kline
> > A.R.S. K2LKK
> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date: 2/9/2008 
>11:54 AM

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2