BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Q signals
From:
Mike Freeman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Sep 2002 23:27:35 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
Good one, Howard!  Definitely QSA5! <g>

Mike Freeman < K 7 U I J >

----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: Q signals


The day we can't use q signals is the day you don't have to know code to
be
a ham, oh oops what day has come.
Let's try again,
the day we can't use q signals is the day that novice and advanced
classes
are eliminated.  Oops that day has come and gone.
Take three.
The day we don't use q signals is the day that 13 or 20 wpm code aren't
necessary for hf operation.

OopsTake four.
I know!!!  let's use ten codes, handles, and made up calls.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2