Please move this thread to another list.  There are tons of them for
discussing such issues.

Very 73 to all.


Kevin :)
Amateur Radio:  K7RX
Navy Marine Corps MARS:  NNN0SHS




-----Original Message-----
From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Patrick Byrne
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 16:18
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: more on JAWS 6.0

This used to be a ham radio reflector.
Pat, K9JAUAt 12:59 PM 2/5/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>go to www.comcast.net and look for the toolbox section of the site,
>you won't find it with flash installed, for email and personal settings and
all.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 12:45 PM
>Subject: Re: more on JAWS 6.0
>
>
> > Well, 6.0 seems to work with what I've seen so far.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 8:36 AM
> > Subject: Re: more on JAWS 6.0
> >
> >
> >> That's why I don't install flash player on my computer,  too much
> >> headache.
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 11:44 PM
> >> Subject: more on JAWS 6.0
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi everyone, I was posting, and then the server cut me off because
> >>> our thread is a little big that JFW 5.0 used to have a lot of
> >>> problems with pages that has those macromedia flash moovies there.
> >>> I found it annoying when I was researching corporations and CEOS
> >>> for the hospital because I would get caught up in those moovies,
> >>> and it would slow 5.0 & 5.1 down and on a few occasions it would
> >>> lock it up.  I don't know what kind of experience or luck I will
> >>> have in a few weeks when I start volunteering, but it should be
> >>> interesting since I am going to be accessing some hospital
> >>> specific applications and E-mail will probably stay the same, but
> >>> I will probably also give it a shot using the tools that this
> >>> citrix program will have.  Tom, I don't know if you do a lot of
> >>> Internet research or how much the rest of you do, but if you do
> >>> the above issue with 5.0 & 5.1 would be a concern.
> >>>
> >