BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Sep 2006 16:26:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
that's all stuff I haven't had for problems yet, most of my issues are on 
the RF side, having to move frequency, problems with radios going bad and 
all, but that should all be fixed now.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: echolink


> the challenge lies in maintaining patients through poor connections, 
> packet
> loss, crappy signals into the nodes and dropped connections.
> But your right, that's about all hi hi.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, September 08, 2006 1:04 PM
> Subject: echolink
>
>
>> Thanks for the info John.  I am not all that crazy about echolink.  Kind 
>> =
>> of like net2phone or email in a way.  I got it working on 1 of my =
>> computers and have not fooled with i9t since.  It isn't like dx on the =
>> ham radio and that is what I am really after.  You know being in the =
>> right place at the right time and dealing with a chalenge.  Echolink is =
>> a way to talk to people but there isn't a chalenge there.
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2