BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 May 2015 08:38:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
It's the same thing. If they're doing away with it for one they're doing 
away with it all together.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Adams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, May 23, 2015 7:26 AM
Subject: FW: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated


> Subject: RE: Amateur Radio Vanity Callsign fees to be eliminated (TCW)
>
> This is very interesting and not totally clear. There are two distinct 
> fees
> regarding Vanity Call Signs; the initial application fee and the renewal
> fee. This NPRM clearly states that the application fees are to be
> eliminated but it is not clear if the renewal fees are also to be
> eliminated. There is no redundancy in fee collections for renewals as 
> there
> is for multiple applications for the same call sign. Time will tell.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2