BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:23:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (114 lines)
Maybe over there, as far as I'm concerned, Kenwood's still in a class of 
their own with audio.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: icom vs kenwood


> for mine, the Icom have the better TX audio these days.
> Use to be kenwood had the nice TX audio but, they seem to have dropped
> off over the years.
>
> Shaun,
>
> vk2fese,
>
>  Everyone hears what you say.
>  Friends listen to what you say.
>  Best friends listen  to what you don't say.
>
> web sites:
>
> http://www.myspace.com/blindmanshaunoliver
>
> http://www.fanfiction.net/~blindphoenix
>
> skype: brailledude
>
> msn: [log in to unmask]
>
> On 5/08/2009 2:48 AM, Keith Barrett went skydiving, and on the way down,
> shouted thus.:
>> Well, it depends what you want to use it for.
>>
>> Just making the same decisions.
>>
>> I have compared the receiver of the ic-910 with the ts2000 and there is
>> no comparison.
>>
>> Using weak beacons just at the noise level and the icom wins every time.
>>
>> Also, the strong signal handelling of the icom is very good.
>>
>> If you are interested in vhf/uhf weak signal ssb and cw then the icom 
>> wins.
>>
>> Only close alternative is the kenwood ts-790.
>>
>>
>>
>> John Miller wrote:
>>> Icom 910 is 2 meters and 440 only with a 1296 option, it has no HF and
>>> probably costs about as much as the Kenwood by the time it's said and 
>>> done,
>>> Kenwood having 160 all the way up, all but 900 MHz and 220.
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Jim Stevenson" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 12:57 PM
>>> Subject: icom vs kenwood
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> I want to choose between the icom 910 and the kenwood 2,000x
>>>>
>>>> 160m through 1296MHz,.
>>>>
>>>> How are the speech accessible features different?
>>>>
>>>> Also I want to compare icom vs kenwood 6m through 450MHz or is it 1296 
>>>> MHz
>>>> talkeys.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks much again as always.
>>>>
>>>> 73
>>>> wb6 yoy
>>>>
>>>> (650) 604-5720
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Jim Stevenson Ph.D
>>>> experimental psychologist, conducting sonification research,
>>>> & certified master Ericksonian clinical hypnotherapist.
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> (650) 604-5720 w
>>>> or leave message any time.
>>>>
>>>> ham call
>>>> wb6yoy
>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
>>> signature database 4304 (20090804) __________
>>>
>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>
>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
>> signature database 4305 (20090804) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2