BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Dresser <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:52:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I've always said there's nothing like a proactive almost thinking radio.

Steve


On 12/13/2012 06:53, Martin G. McCormick wrote:
> Yup. Some of this stuff can almost think for itself and that one
> was being proactive. I believe there used to be some research in
> to analog spread spectrum but nobody waited long enough for
> another radio in the area to develop the same glitch and then
> figure out how to synchronize them. Oh, the short-sighted things
> we do to stanch innovation. Sad, isn't it?
> Steve Dresser writes:
>    
>> That radio may just have been ahead of its time, trying to do spread
>> spectrum.
>>      
>
>    

ATOM RSS1 RSS2