BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Barrett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 May 2006 17:27:12 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Yes, I would have to agree with that although, not sure that the 
newer ones have the same audio quality as the older ones with the 
high voltage finals.  More distortion products in a 12 volt final.


On 31 May 2006 at 11:25, John Miller wrote:

> still can't beat Kenwood audio in most people's books though. Icom is better 
> than they were and I'd look to them maybe for another radio down the road, 
> I'd have to lean toward Kenwood until Icom audio is a little better and they 
> can read the menus though I do manage with my 706 just fine. All the rest 
> art totally not accessible right now with out computer and I don't want to 
> hook my HF radio to a computer to use it unless I'm running it via remote 
> control. Some day I'll learn ham radio deluxe enough so I can do a little 
> more of that.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Keith Barrett" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 7:37 AM
> Subject: Re: tentec
> 
> 
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > I almost get the feeling that kenwood are no longer placing
> > themselves in the top end of the hf market.  When you think that the
> > last one was the ts-950sdx which has been gone a good 10 years now.
> >
> > Perhaps they think the research and development costs are too high?
> > Although yaesu seem to be launching a lot of stuff at the moment.
> >
> > Not sure about the jupiter but I had an omni series some years ago
> > which was one of the best receivers I have ever used.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30 May 2006 at 22:55, Richard Fiorello wrote:
> >
> >> Hi;
> >> Well, the tentec orion is a bit pricey for my budget but I am curious if
> >> anyone has tried the tentec jupiter?  Its probably the best idea but I 
> >> kind
> >> of hate limiting my choices to kenwood or Icom.  Speaking of kenwood, 
> >> anyone
> >> have any thoughts as to why they haven't come out with something similar 
> >> to
> >> ft1000 or icom 756?
> >> Richard
> >>
> >>
> >> __________ NOD32 1.1569 (20060531) Information __________
> >>
> >> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> >> http://www.eset.com
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Keith
> >
> > - - - -
> >
> > Keith Barrett
> > email <[log in to unmask]>
> > Website www.barrettpianos.co.uk
> > Amateur radio callsign gw4nby
> > Corntown, South Wales
> >
> >
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 1.1569 (20060531) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 


Keith

- - - -

Keith Barrett
email <[log in to unmask]>
Website www.barrettpianos.co.uk
Amateur radio callsign gw4nby
Corntown, South Wales

ATOM RSS1 RSS2