BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:44:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (96 lines)
Tom, It's a shame that happened, but there are always groups and 
organizations that can use your services if you feel the one you're with is 
giving you the short end of things. Trust me, I have my moments with the MA 
Emergency management agency but I know if things get beyond where I want to 
deal with it anymore, there are plenty of groups and places where I can get 
appreciated and a couple are knocking my door down letting me know if I want 
to join them instead there's a reserved seat and one group even told me if I 
join them and let them know what they need to add to the radios to make them 
more accessible for me they'll do it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 5:21 AM
Subject: Re: In a state of disbelief here


>    Colin:
>
> Thanks for helping put things into perspective here, and you are correct.
>
> We indeed do have a cheat sheet of needed frequencies (repeaters, simplex,
> and otherwise), in our area.  In fact, I helped design it.  I believe it
> amounts to something like 65 memories we are programming into these rigs.
>
> So, as you say, I can manage, I'm sure, if I have to.
>
> It's just the lack of consultation thing that really gets me.
>
> And, here's another interesting wrinkle to add to the mix. ... When they
> ordered the rigs, noone thought to order programming cables and software 
> for
> the rigs.  I brought up the need for those items with our county 
> officials,
> indicating that for a mere $100 or so, we could get the needed cables and
> software, but was turned down.  Fortunately, thanks to a donor in our 
> group,
> the cables and software were purchased and given to the group.  But, I 
> have
> to tell you, all of this is making me seriously re-think giving up endless
> amounts of my time and energy in the future as County EC, if this is the
> approach the leadership in our area is going to take.
>
> Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 2:45 AM
> Subject: Re: In a state of disbelief here
>
>
>> firstly, no, these two radios don't have options for speech synthesisers.
>> I believe the 2200 has an allowance for direct frequency entry, and 
>> memory
>> location entry via the mic keypad...the 2820 may have that as well
>> I assume the reason 2820H's were chosen was for the DStar option...even 
>> if
>> it wasn't purchased as an option with the radio, it can be added on later
>> if
>> needed.  Emergency stuff is really embracing DStar technology now.
>> While these radios don't have speech output, it doesn't make them totally
>> unusable by a blind op.
>> Presumably your EOC has a standardized frequency list for all facility
>> radios and for members radios.
>> These two will have  that standardized list programmed in and that will
>> make
>> them usable if you have at least a cheat sheet of the channel numbers
>> assigned to various frequencies.
>> Most EOC's, ARES and other various agencies will program their radios 
>> with
>> a
>> standardized list of frequencies that will include any and all major
>> repeater and simplex frequencies one would ever need.
>> So, make up a braille sheet or keep a list on a portable note taker with
>> that list.
>> Beyond that, both the 2200 and 2820 are physically no more difficult to
>> use
>> as a blind op...volume is still volume, and squelch, and one can memorize
>> button layouts like you would have to do with any other rig.
>> Anoying for sure, but not a deal breaker in my book.
>> I doubt they're going to send the radios back if they wish to have DStar
>> capability.
>> I would be pissed in your position though.  Someone somewhere made
>> recommendations as to the biggest, best, most modern radios to buy, and
>> they
>> went for it.
>> Also, Icom is big on the patriotic Icom america thing, so many agencies
>> automatically turn to "Icom america" for their equipment.
>> Their marketting is second to none in the US.
>> Anyway, insure that you make your views known and perhaps they'll do
>> something about it, but if nothing is done, fear not, you can manage with
>> what is there.
>>
>> 73
>> Colin, V A6BKX 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2