BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Thurman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:03:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
no the dsp is int he if ont he 480 and the 2000 main reciever as well    the 2k is total crap on vhf uhf though and I wish I had ogtten a 480 back in the day when i got the 2k  as it failed me for the second time on satellites

On Jun 23, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Butch Bussen wrote:

> Also, the dsp is better in the 590, and it is in the i f, and I believe 
> the 480 is in the audio section.  I have both rigs and like them both, 
> but I really like the 590.
> 73
> Butch
> WA0VJR
> Node 3148
> Wallace, ks.
> 
> 
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2012, Howard Kaufman wrote:
> 
>> Audio and roofing filters.
>> I don't want to get my hands on a 590, because I will love my 480 less I am
>> afraid.
>> 
>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2