BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Sep 2006 10:03:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (78 lines)
Hmmm, mine supposedly is new, but maybe the 420 to 512 MHz version is 
different than the other ones since it needs to be adjusted for the band 
it's used on. The bottom of mine is just like the diamond but the element is 
aluminum put together with the clamps like the ringo,  it might just be the 
model I have is like that though since it does really have a long way it's 
used for and can be adjusted for. Either way, I'd trust it anywhere and 
forgetting about it, it's thick aluminum unlike my old 2 meter ringo which 
is in my cellar for sale.  The tram is about twice the wall thickness.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: looking for a base antenna.


> John:
> you must have had an old old version or something because the trams are 
> not
> even close to anything made by ringo.
> They are actually nearly identical to the diamond dual band verticals.
> I have side by side compared them with a few diamonds on the ground and 
> the
> only differences are in the various differences in hard ware design and
> probably some amount of durability issues.
> I would however feel comfortable putting the tram on the top of a tower 
> and
> forgetting about it...a ringo, i would not.
> The tram, since its probably made with les expensive parts, does need to 
> be
> reenforced at certain points such as at the joint of the sections, but 
> what
> antenna doesn't? even the most expensive top of the line vertical, i would
> put tape and or watter sealer in the joints when putting it on the top of 
> a
> tower.
>
> The current trams are fiber glass tubes with stainless elements inside and
> large coils which are stream lined inside the fiberglass tube.
> They have a very good pattern, with no apparent lobes or nuls as do some
> supposedly omny directional antennas.
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 5:57 AM
> Subject: Re: looking for a base antenna.
>
>
>> the Tram antennas are made like the ringo ranger, the one I have anyway,
> has
>> a coil in a plastic case, but the antenna is actually pretty thick
> aluminum.
>> I usually much prefer diamond antennas, but I got the tram because it was
>> cheap. Due to some stuff I'm doing over here, like upgrading my echolink
>> link, I'm going to have take a ham duel bander and use that in place of
> the
>> TRAM with a duplexer and retune it a little but I can do that easy 
>> enough.
>> Anyway, the Tram antenna is really a nice one. I'll keep it for down the
>> road.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 12:45 AM
>> Subject: Re: looking for a base antenna.
>>
>>
>> > Are these antennas you described fiberglass or the typical plastic with
>> > coax inside?  I had a ringo ranger dual band, and it was aluminum.  I
>> > generally like diamond and commit.
>> > 73s
>> > Butch Bussen
>> > wa0vjr
>> >
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2