BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Robert E. Martin" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Nov 2002 11:42:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
Putting up an antenna system is not an absolute right.  The battle has
raged for years.  A search on The ARRL Web Site will yield lots of current
information on the subject.  In most cases which I have read, community
restrictions on antenna structures have held up.  That's not good but true.

A friend of mine won his case by a detailed reading of his Neighborhood
Association Contract.  For example, the contract stated that none of the
units could have front porches but three houses did.  His bargaining chip
was "If you'll knock down your front porches, I'll take down my antenna.

Search ARRL site.

73
Bob Martin
KC3FI
At 05:37 AM 11/1/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C28168.B540CD20
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>         charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>Hello Everyone,
>
>I've been lurking on this list for sometime and finally have a question =
>I'd like to throw out for comment.
>Years ago, hamclubs that I belonged to commonly expoused the idea that =
>the FCC had rules that protected hams from undue badgering from =
>communities when ham antennas were put up on private property.  The idea =
>was that hams play an important role during civil emergencies.
>
>Throughout the years, I never had a problem with anyone anywhere =
>concerning my antennas although I heard lots of bad stories.
>Finally after 48 years of hamming, I've run into my first problem with a =
>local housing development here in Hawaii.  The home owners book on =
>restrictions limit antennas to some CB and VHF antennas.  As an HF CW =
>guy, I plan to appeal. =20
>Does anyone have information concerning FCC regulations or other legal =
>decisions that might be used in my argument?
>
>Thanks,
>Larry K6HWT
>
>
>        =20
>
>------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C28168.B540CD20
>Content-Type: text/html;
>         charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
>Hello Everyone,
>
>I've been lurking on this list for = sometime and=20 finally have a
>question I'd like to throw out for comment.
>Years ago, hamclubs that I belonged to = commonly=20 expoused the idea
>that the FCC had rules that protected hams from undue=20 badgering from
>communities when ham antennas were put up on private=20 property.  The
>idea was that hams play an important role during = civil=20 emergencies.
>
>Throughout the years, I never had a = problem with=20 anyone anywhere
>concerning my antennas although I heard lots of bad=20 stories.
>Finally after 48 years of hamming, I've = run=20 into my first problem
>with a local housing development here in=20 Hawaii.  The home owners book
>on restrictions limit antennas = to some=20 CB and VHF antennas.  As an HF
>CW guy, I plan to=20 appeal.
>Does anyone have information concerning = FCC=20 regulations or other
>legal decisions that might be used in my=20 argument?
>
>Thanks,
>Larry K6HWT
>
>
>        =20
>
>------=_NextPart_000_00A2_01C28168.B540CD20--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2