BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:36:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (88 lines)
I've only heard one on phone, they must all be on CW, it sounded on phone 
like a typical alinco DX-70, ear splittingly narrow. I say a typical DX-70 
because a friend of mine has one that sounds incredible but he did a ton of 
work to it and I think a lot was done before he got it too.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lou Kolb" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: TS2000S -- Why the Critique


>I hear them all the  time, John and I agree with Lou.  True, they're mainly
> used by cW ops but apparently, their recievers are unbelievable.  I say
> "apparently" because I've never used one but of the many folks I've worked
> and talked to about them, the praise for the recievers is unanimous.  Lou
> WA3MIX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 3:34 PM
> Subject: Re: TS2000S -- Why the Critique
>
>
>> it's hard to find a lot of complaints when you never even hear them on 
>> the
>> air in the first place or hardly know anyone running them. Looking at the
>> specs as I see them, I think I'll stick with my kenwoods and icoms.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Lou Kline" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 3:00 PM
>> Subject: Re: TS2000S -- Why the Critique
>>
>>
>> > Hi.  Maybe I'll have to look to Elecraft for my next HF rig--I don't
> hear
>> > anyone complaining about their quality or performance.
>> >
>> > I'm thinking that the TS790A was around $1700 new, and I bought mine
> used
>> > from AES for $900 plus the cost of a VS2 voice synthesizer.
>> >
>> > If Icom did better in the accessibility arena, I would have left 
>> > Kenwood
>> > for Icom a long time ago because they just have a better knack for
>> > building
>> > good quiet receivers, as long as you stay away from their bottom end
>> > radios.
>> >
>> > My point is that Icom Yaesu, and Ten Tec don't have any problem 
>> > catering
>> > to
>> > the high end.  And Kenwood used to build some very good stuff.
>> > --Lou K2LKK
>> >
>> >
>> > At 12:43 PM 2/3/2008 +0000, you wrote:
>> >>Just another thought.
>> >>
>> >>Are we prepared to pay for high end rigs?
>> >>
>> >>My kenwood ts790 cost 1200 uk pounds probably close on 2000 dollars?
>> >>
>> >>My ts-950sdx was arround 3000 uk pounds again not sure in us dollars.
>> >>
>> >>Compare this to the ts2000 and other such units.
>> >>
>> >>I still wish there was more choice at the high end.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>--
>> >>No virus found in this incoming message.
>> >>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> >>Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.20.0/1268 - Release Date:
> 2/9/2008
>> >>11:54 AM
>> >
>> > Louis Kim Kline
>> > A.R.S. K2LKK
>> > Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>> > Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
>> > Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5740
>> >
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2