LISTSERV - BLIND-HAMS Archives - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	BLIND-HAMS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: CEPT, and remote hams question
From:	"Ray T. Mahorney" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 2 Feb 2016 00:00:53 -0000
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (36 lines)

just to expand as I also hold a UK call I think CEPT would only come into play if I were to operate
outside the UK under either call.  


Ray T. Mahorney
WA4WGA
M0WGA


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David
Pearson
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 23:01
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: CEPT, and remote hams question

Hi:

The ARRL seems to feel  that in order to "control" an amateur station governed by the CEPt agreement
a ham must be physically present in the CEPT's qth(country).If this interpretation is correct, this
would severely reduce the # of stations which may be operated by U.S hams via the
RCFORB(client) application.

Any other opinions on this?

Best regards,



David S. Pearson-wa4dsp 


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG