Well, John, I agree.  I have too many wires around my shack already without
having my radio in two parts.  However, if the Kenwood TS480S is as good as
everyone says it is, I suppose I could live with it.  Heck, I'd just force
myself to put up with another cable! <grin>

73, de Lou K2LKK


At 08:00 PM 2/9/2005 -0500, you wrote:
>In a base setup, I think having the head separate is more of a problem then
>anything, especially for me, it would annoy me to no end but to each his
>own.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:08 PM
>Subject: Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;
>
>
> >I get great reports on the processor in my ts480.  I can't imagine a better
> > radio, especially for the money.  You'd really have to try to damage that
> > connecting cable.  As far as not being able to connect the control head to
> > the front of the radio, why would you ever want to?  After running the
> > radio for about five minutes, that seems about as useful as tits on a
> > bull.
> >

Louis Kim Kline
A.R.S. K2LKK
Home e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work e-mail:  [log in to unmask]
Work Telephone:  (585) 697-5753