BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Aug 2007 14:58:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
well, the radioshack coax and connectors are the worst all around, but I'm 
the same way, with heavy coax, no crimp connectors. They're just simply not 
as good. I guess the crimp N connectors are alright for some reason, but I 
don't use those for anything right now.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 2:35 PM
Subject: Re: crimping verses solder


> The only difference is if there is stress on the connection.  I remember 
> after
> first putting up my tower, in the middle of a contact with a guy in Japan 
> on 20
> meters, his signal dropped suddenly and precipitously.  The problem?  The 
> damn
> crimped SO-239 connector from my Radio Shack coax let go.  No crimped 
> connectors
> for outside work any more for me.
>
> Steve, K8SP
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gery Gaubert" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 1:18 PM
> Subject: crimping verses solder
>
>
> Is there any difference in sr if crimped?  If not I'm thinking that this
> would be easier for me.  Thepl259 connctors that you solder aren't
> thatmuch cheeper than the crimp ones, at leat not where I bought them
> from. 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2