BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Walt Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 May 2006 19:35:26 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
I think it's nothing more than a server software default.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: List Policy was: coax question


They had that idiocy on the old list serve too, doesn't make sense to me =
but oh well. I don't run the list. Usually if I get that warning that I =
went over I don't even bother shortening my messages anymore.=20
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Ham Steve=20
  To: [log in to unmask]
  Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:50 PM
  Subject: Re: List Policy was: coax question


  Ken,

  I wonder what the logic is now of limiting posts to the list to 250 =
lines.=20
  If there were no limitation, then I could post the article on =
soldering=20
  coaxial cable directly to the list.  But, as it is, it exceeds the =
limit by=20
  100 lines.

  The message from the listserv indicates that these limits are up to=20
  individual listowners and not a functional limitation of the server.

  Take my advice, I don't use it anyway

  Steve
  Lansing, Mi

ATOM RSS1 RSS2