Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 Aug 2007 15:55:25 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't think you want to try the ft1000 MP. I did and can be done but very
cumbersome. I used an external keypad that was made for the ft1000 MP and
that helped but some buttons have duel and triple functions. I unloaded it
and picked up an ICOM 775 which is pretty blind friendly and also puts out
200 watts. It also has the voice synthesizer. I like it very much. It is
also a big radio which I like I also use the millenium QSYER which is a
great help. Of all of the ham radios I have owned, I like this one the
best..
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] Getting on HF
> It was the case, I think it might have even been Chip Margoli who said
> that.
> Now that Dennis Mauchenbacher (sp) has taken over and with the 450 at
> least
> having a modicum of speech capability, maybe things are changing for the
> better.
> I'd love to performance of the FT1000MP if it were accessible.
>
> Steve, K8SP
> Lansing, Mi
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Clegg" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 5:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Getting on HF
>
>
> I can't imagine someone in a high position actually making a statement
> like
> that but that's probably not the first time I'm sure.
>
> Of the big Japanese companies I think I'd buy Kenwood first.
>
> I don't care much for Icom gear either.
>
> Eric
> KU3I
>
|
|
|