No, Walt,

The message that came back indicates it is up to the listowner's discretion 
if there is any limitation on message size.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Walt Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: List Policy was: coax question


>I think it's nothing more than a server software default.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "John Miller" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 5:44 PM
> Subject: Re: List Policy was: coax question
>
>
> They had that idiocy on the old list serve too, doesn't make sense to me =
> but oh well. I don't run the list. Usually if I get that warning that I =
> went over I don't even bother shortening my messages anymore.=20
>  ----- Original Message -----=20
>  From: Ham Steve=20
>  To: [log in to unmask]
>  Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 4:50 PM
>  Subject: Re: List Policy was: coax question
>
>
>  Ken,
>
>  I wonder what the logic is now of limiting posts to the list to 250 =
> lines.=20
>  If there were no limitation, then I could post the article on =
> soldering=20
>  coaxial cable directly to the list.  But, as it is, it exceeds the =
> limit by=20
>  100 lines.
>
>  The message from the listserv indicates that these limits are up to=20
>  individual listowners and not a functional limitation of the server.
>
>  Take my advice, I don't use it anyway
>
>  Steve
>  Lansing, Mi
>
>