BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Fiorello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Aug 2009 13:03:06 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Hi;
True I suspect we will never agree on this issue.  I was never a fan of audible signals but if they help a few folks what's the harm?
As for software, I tried asking gw micro what questions to ask to see if their software would work with a companies programs.  The bottom line was just try it.
I have twice with rather dismal results.  The real question might be would scripts or set files have made a seemingly difficult situation more manageable?
Our office hired lots of folks in their 60s or 70s primarily because they wanted the job for health insurance.
Finally how do we constructively work with yaesu tentec and maybe icom to make their radios more user friendly?  How do we commend kenwood for the great job they have consistently done?
I still have a problem with the fact that tentec was number one with speech and their current stance is just get a computer, screen reader and hrd and are radios are totally usable.
Didn't mean to forget elcraft.  From what I am told they too disserve a thumbs up.
Richard

ATOM RSS1 RSS2