Pat,

I don't understand how that would eliminate the functionality of the tower? 
If you end-mast mount the rotor on the top end of the tower, you can still 
telescope it, if you are referring to the same Wilson I had?

Steve
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 12:05 AM
Subject: Re: from Jennifer to Pat


Of course you could rotate only the antenna Jennifer, but that would
eliminate the functionality of the tower.  But a person can do as
they wish.  And my apologies to the rest of the list, I'll continue
any other responses off-list.
Pat, K9JAUAt 10:49 PM 11/5/2008, you wrote:
>Okay that is what I thought.  So another thing is that if you needed to can
>you put a rotor on the tower?  I mean I do not need to turn the tower just
>the antenna.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:24 PM
>Subject: Re: from Jennifer to Pat
>
>
> > Yes, the tower will raise and tilt without the rotor; two different
> > animals.At 08:36 PM 11/4/2008, you wrote:
> >>It helps but I thought you did not need the rotor except for the antenna.
> >>I
> >>thoguht the tower tilted over and cranked up and down with out the rotor.
> >>This tower is something different that I had learned about.  s I was
> >>comfused about that.  So if I take the rotor off for instance and use it
> >>on
> >>the other tower that would not work.
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "Pat Byrne" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 6:05 PM
> >>Subject: Re: from Jennifer to Pat
> >>
> >>
> >> > Jennifer,
> >> > The rotator is mounted at the base of the tower.  And the base of the
> >> > tower is mounted to a bearing which supports the tower and the
> >> > antenna which is bolted to its top.  So, when you rotate you are
> >> > actually rotating the tower with the antenna attached.  Does that help?
> >> > patAt 03:04 PM 11/4/2008, you wrote:
> >> >>Hi Pat I have a question about he towser.  someone was looking at it
> >> >>and =
> >> >>trying to tell me what it looks like and so on.  If I understood right
> >> >>=
> >> >>the tower has to have the rotor to move it around?  I thought the rotor
> >> >>=
> >> >>was for the antenna and that was it.  I thought the tower had it's own
> >> >>=
> >> >>way of moving.