BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Winches <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:11:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Have you tried this in a horizontal configuration vs. vertical.  Yes 2
inches above ground would not be good choice.   


###
BRETT WINCHESTER  KD7JN 
[log in to unmask] 
208-639-8386
###


-----Original Message-----
From: For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Frederick
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: buddipole.

Hi
     Personally I have received decent but not outstanding reports using
a single ham stick mobile antenna mounted about six feet off the ground.
For some reason I can't explain putting two hamsticks together in the
dipole configuration decreased my signal strength reports. I should
mention I am using them on 75 meters. So, having them with the lower
half of the antenna about two inches off the ground is bound to decrease
the efficiency.
    These are just my thoughts but for about $29 per antenna they are
quite a bargain and I have had a blast with them.

God bless,
Mark
God loves you!
My ham radio lists.
http://lists.topica.com/lists/funhamradio.
http://groups.google.com/group/funhamradio-list
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shaun Oliver" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: buddipole.


> in that case, what would you reccomend for an antenna? do bare in mind
> I'm on a budget. I might just have to string up a 40 m length of wire
> and fiddle about with a tuner to match it. I can make a dipole easily
> enough but I need stealth and blind friendly. and I'm well aware that
> the two aren't synonymous with one another..
> thanks. shaun.
>
>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2