BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Sep 2006 14:48:07 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
for my purposes, XM puts serious in the toilet though unfortunately, I'll 
have to get serius soon too for my NASCAR coverage on vacations and stuff 
but I really don't want to since they have nothing else I like, and a couple 
things I absolutely don't want.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: BJS XM Radio needs our help


> AM/FM radio is dying, and I've heard that Serious is better then XM.
> Stations that have been really self suficient have been taken over by
> corporations.  On another note, Clear Channel seems to have a political
> message.  The conservatives get to be on these powerful stations, and then
> things like Air America are on weak stations.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Harvey wrote:
>
>> I don't have XM either, but I do care because corporate giants like Clear
>> Channel and others have virtually ruined commercial broadcasting and have
>> bought off the FCC.  Now that millions have gone to satellite for which 
>> they
>> are willing to pay, instead of playing fair by letting the marketplace
>> decide things, and waking up and smelling the coffee, they want to play
>> dirty and restrict satellite radio and ruin it as they have done to
>> commercial radio just because they are too cheap and lazy to get off 
>> their
>> corporate butts and give the listeners what they want.
>> Harvey
>>
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2