BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony Vece <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:46:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Great! I hope it all works out.
Anthony


Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 4, 2010, at 9:29 AM, tom behler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>    Anthony:
>
> Taking echo-link check-ins during our net is something I didn't  
> quite think
> of before.
>
> I'm not sure exactly how it would work, but if someone wants to take  
> the
> lead on this, let's try it.
>
> It would be good for the person taking the lead to have some  
> substantial
> echo-link experience, though.
>
> Sounds interesting.
>
> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Vece" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, January 03, 2010 10:45 PM
> Subject: Re: record-setting net today!
>
>
> Hi Tom;
> I think it would be nice if someone could take Echolink checkins
> during this net.
> I know I would be more than happy to participate.
> 73 De Anthony w2ajv
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:44 PM, tom behler <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Well, for those of you who don't know, or who missed it, we had a
>> record 27
>> check-ins for this afternoon's cross-country blind ops net.  The net
>> ran for
>> an hour and 27 minutes.
>>
>> I hope folks had as much fun as I did, just hearing the variety of
>> people
>> and locations that were represented.
>>
>> On the net this afternoon, Bob (K8LR) suggested that we try an echo-
>> link net
>> sometime, for those who can't seem to get into our HF net  
>> festivities.
>>
>> I got to thinking about the echo-link possibility, and would like to
>> propose
>> that we keep doing the SSB net as usual, now that we are finding 20
>> meters
>> to work much better, but maybe have the echo-link net at some other
>> day and
>> time?  I'm willing to continue holding down the fort on the SSB net,
>> but am
>> thinking that it would be good if someone else with a particular
>> interest in
>> Echo-link could spearhead the echo-link  operation.
>>
>> This way, we'll have two nets, and two ways to talk with each other.
>>
>> I'd be curious to know what everyone else thinks.
>>
>> 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2