BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Kenyon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 May 2006 18:00:55 -0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (95 lines)
Hi Anthony and the group.  I heard some SSB coms last night on the CB
channels on my scanner, but when I got a radio that offers SSB on that
band it was gone and I couldn't find any more.  I thought I'd find
something but it was busy until I got to the other radio.





On Wed, 17 May 2006, Anthony Vece wrote:

> Hi Russ;
>
> Do you have a list of the cb channels?
>
> And I think they only use lower sideband above channel 35 or something like
> that.
>
> Anthony
>
> 73 De Anthony W2AJV
> [log in to unmask]
> ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Russ Kiehne" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:42 AM
> Subject: Re: [BLIND-HAMS] just an item of interest and an observation
>
>
> > Speaking of cb, if you are interested, I have both the cb ten code and the
> > cb slang in text form.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: just an item of interest and an observation
> >
> >
> >> NO, nothing is wrong, but I was just wondering if any of you take any
> >> advantage of that band at all?
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 4:54 PM
> >> Subject: Re: just an item of interest and an observation
> >>
> >>
> >>> something wrong with CB frequencies?
> >>> Just cuz they're not hams doesn't mean they should automatically be
> >>> blocked
> >>> from general coverage receivers....
> >>> Same reason many general coverage receivers have the 45-50MHZ band in
> >>> them...not because there is much there, other then baby monitors and
> >>> some
> >>> older cordless phones but because its just part of the general
> >>> coverage...
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> Colin
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: "Jeff Kenyon" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:35 PM
> >>> Subject: just an item of interest and an observation
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hi everyone, I have noticed that a lot of the radios I have gotten have
> >>> the
> >>>> CB channels as coverage.  I don't listen to them that much, and haven't
> >>>> operated on CB for years, but I have noticed that with my DX-390 and my
> >>> F6a,
> >>>> and my scanners I have CB coverage.  I am just wondering why so many
> >>> radios
> >>>> have this?  I happened to tune by someone on the CB band this afternoon
> >>> and
> >>>> shall we say he was conducting himself in a way that the ham community
> >>> would
> >>>> frown on.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.6.0/341 - Release Date: 5/16/2006
> >
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2