BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
T Behler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 25 May 2006 14:53:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
    Phil and all:

This really makes you question the wisdom of the FCC, doesn't it?

Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Scovell" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:06 PM
Subject: Digital AM Receivers


> Anybody have a recommendation for a digital AM receiver?  Boy, lots, over
a
> dozen, digital signals now here in Denver, if not more, and growing all
the
> time and even with the little stations.  In fact, I cannot even hear a
> station that used to be 10 over S9 in Cheyenne because two local stations
> close together are running their digital signals in-between and the
digital
> signals are so loud, they cover up the station 100 miles away that used to
> be considered a local station in Denver's market.
>
> Phil.
> K0NX
>
>
> Has He Ever Crossed Your Mind?
> www.SafePlaceFellowship.com
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2