BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Aaron Cannon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:50:56 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Never mind.  The statement is correct.  I was just thinking about it wrong.

And to think I'm only two classes away from getting my BS in mathematics.
<g>

73s
kd6qpk


- --
Skype: cannona
MSN/Windows Messenger: [log in to unmask] (don't send email to the hotmail
address.)
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Cannon" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:27 PM
Subject: dbi vs. dbd


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> I have found several web pages that say:
> "Values given in dBd can be converted to dBi units by Adding 2.14 this is
> because a Dipole Antenna has 2.14dB gain over an isotropic radiator, I.e.
> a
> Dipole antenna is said to have 2.14 dBi gain."
>
> The text seems to imply that a dipole antenna (measured in DBD) has a
> greater numeric value than an isotropic antenna (measured in DBI), because
> they say things like, "a Dipole Antenna has 2.14dB gain over an isotropic
> radiator".  However, in there formula, they say that you add 2.14 to dbd
> to
> get dbi, which would give dbi a greater numeric value then DBD.
>
> What am I missing, or did everyone just copy from everyone else and get it
> wrong?
>
> The reason I am interested is because I'm studying for my extra class exam
> and this has come up.
>
> Thanks!
>
> 73s
> kd6qpk
>
>
> - --
> Skype: cannona
> MSN/Windows Messenger: [log in to unmask] (don't send email to the
> hotmail
> address.)
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
> Comment: Key available from all major key servers.
>
> iEYEAREDAAYFAkepN1kACgkQI7J99hVZuJeDtgCeNDlxc2i2WxYMTIH8zTACJSl0
> IyIAoM6ssi83YC4nblP/fPU53wAF5gy/
> =YdNg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959
Comment: Key available from all major key servers.

iEYEAREDAAYFAkepPLUACgkQI7J99hVZuJfPtACfR8zY3+O6FDT/S+Vynn6+MnnV
bNUAoMPqkVU+Q7I4U4NiM5BO6L3VYWq0
=VTW3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2