BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:00:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
In a base setup, I think having the head separate is more of a problem then
anything, especially for me, it would annoy me to no end but to each his
own.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: Kenwood H F Transceiver;


>I get great reports on the processor in my ts480.  I can't imagine a better
> radio, especially for the money.  You'd really have to try to damage that
> connecting cable.  As far as not being able to connect the control head to
> the front of the radio, why would you ever want to?  After running the
> radio for about five minutes, that seems about as useful as tits on a
> bull.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2