BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:21:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
Give them time, the Chinese radios will be just as much as all the rest 
before you know it.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "colin McDonald" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: Yaesu Mic on a Kenwood


> the DSP technology in the ts570 is way way more than 10 years old.
> The DSP technology in the ts2000 is more than 11 years old at this point
> since I think they proto typed the ts2K in the late '90's, probably 98/99
> before they released it in 2000.
> the ts570 has been around allot longer than the ts2000...not sure exactly
> when the 570 was released, but it was at least 15 years ago, likely longer
> than that.
> I was having a conversation with a few local hams about this exact
> thing...how technology in the ham radio industry hasn't changed a whole 
> lot
> in about 10 to 15 years.
> And, the big 3 are still charging huge amounts of money for new radios 
> that
> use the same older technology in them such as DSP circuits and general
> functions and features.
> This is why I am really looking forward to the products designed by
> companies like Wouxun and others...they will have the tradditional
> technology, but will also be far more willing to implement brand new stuff
> into their radios and products without charging twice as much for the new
> features like the big 3 like to do.
> It would be like apple releasing an old '90's style flip phone, with blue
> tooth,  and charging double for it because it's an apple product and has
> some newer technology in it...that is what is happening in the ham radio
> industry...we are still getting radios that have the same features, and
> functions, and similar design and circuitry as what was availible 15 years
> ago.
> And anything that does have newer or improved design features is hugely
> expensive...see the IC7800 and radios in it's class.
> They add some more functions via the micro processer, throw a few more 
> knobs
> and buttons and connecters into the thing and charge 11 grand for it.
> the radio probably costs 200 bucks to build.
> So, companies like wouxun, will take all the best features, and combine 
> them
> into a classy looking, desirable rig and charge 500 for it and still make 
> a
> big proffit.
>
> There are rumblings about wouxun coming out with an HF rig in the not too
> distant future...I can't wait to see that.
> Give the big 3 a real run for their money hi.
> Something that is say similar to the IC7000 or FT857 for half or a third 
> of
> the price.
>
> 73
> Colin, V A6BKX
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Michael Ryan" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 1:05 PM
> Subject: Yaesu Mic on a Kenwood
>
>
>> Hi all:=20
>>
>> Ordered my new antenna today and I've been thinking about a backup plan, 
>> =
>> should my FT-450 don't tune my G5RV and the TS-570 does.=20
>> Would it be safe to use my MD-100A8X desk mic on the 570? =20
>> I've been also thinking that I'd have to unload the FT-450 as it =
>> wouldn't be suitable for an HF remote.=20
>> I wouldn't install it as a mobile because that would require some more =
>> expense, plus it would have to be professionally installed, under the =
>> terms of our agreement with our car's company,=20
>> plus there isn't much room for the 450 in the car. =20
>> I hope it doesn't come to that because I love the 450 and having tested =
>> it for almost a year now, I think for the price, its one of the best =
>> performing rigs in its class.=20
>> It out performs the 570 as well. Course, the 570's DSP system is 10 year 
>> =
>> old technology, which is why the 590 was released last year.=20
>> It probably performs better than the FT-450 but its also twice as
>> much.=20=
>>
>> =20
>>
>> 73:=20
>>
>> Michael De VO1RYN=20 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2